Legal Opinion

Sellers v. Pinedale Residential Center

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 3, 2002No. 3508PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFF, Judge:

Pinedale Residential Center and Hartford Accident & Indemnity (collectively “Employer”) appeal the order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission adjusting Jarrod Sellers’ average weekly wage and compensation rate based on his future earning capacity. We affirm.

FACTS

Sellers suffered an admitted injury by accident on December 12, 1992, when he was involved in an automobile accident while working for Employer. At the time of the accident, Sellers was sixteen years old and a high school student. As a result of the accident, Sellers suffered injuries to his spine and spinal cord which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Lyles v. Quantum Chemical Co. (Emery)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hutson v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Smith v. NCCI, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Forrest v. A.S. Price MechanicalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Brunson v. American Koyo BearingsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Pilgrim v. EatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API