Pilgrim v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
391 S.C. 38 (2010)
703 S.E.2d 241
Danny R. PILGRIM, Respondent,
v.
Billy EATON and Rufus Revis, and S.C. Workers Compensation Uninsured Employers' Fund, Defendants,
of whom Billy Eaton and Rufus Revis are Appellants, and
S.C. Workers Compensation Uninsured Employers' Fund is also Respondent.
No. 4767.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Heard May 19, 2010.
Decided December 15, 2010.
Thomas Bailey Smith, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellants.
Amy V. Cofield, of Lexington; Ernest Caskey Trammell, of Anderson, for Respondents.
FEW, C.J.
This appeal presents two questions related to workers' compensation. The first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Shealy v. Algernon Blair, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Clade v. Champion LaboratoriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pikaart v. a & a Taxi, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Swilling v. Pride Masonry of GaffneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Brown v. Peoplease Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Pugh v. PIEDMONT MECHANICALCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Samuel Paulino v. Diversified Coatings, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.