Legal Opinion

Lowman v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

Ordinarily whether or not the trial judge grants a motion to make a pleading more definite, as provided in G. S., 1-153, is within his discretion. And where there is nothing on the record, as in the instant case, to indicate the motion was denied as a matter of law, it will be presumed the judge denied it in his discretion. Brown v. Hall, 226 N. C., 732, 40 S.E. (2d), 412; Cody v. Hovey, 219 N. C., 369, 14 S. E. (2d), 30; Wolf v. Goldstein, 192 N. C., 818, 135 S. E., 39; Hensley v. Furniture Co., 164 N. C., 148, 80 S. E., 154. It would seem the motion had some merit, but such orders entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Wolf v. . GoldsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Phelps v. McCotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API