Legal Opinion
Cody v. . Hovey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 9, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
This case comes to us upon appeal by defendant from an order of the court below denying his motion for leave to file amendment to his answer, and from judgment on the pleadings for plaintiff.
It was admitted in the pleadings that in an action duly constituted in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, a court of general jurisdiction, wherein Francis A. Cody was plaintiff and Herman TV. Booth and George I. Hovey were defendants, judgment was rendered that plaintiff recover of defendant the sum of money alleged. It was also admitted that defendant Hovey was duly served with process in that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anglo-American Provision Co. v. Davis Provision Co. No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bigelow v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Weld v. . Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Consolidated Vending Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Lockman v. . LockmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.