Legal Opinion
Megan E. Baan, as the Personal etc. v. Columbia County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 7, 2015No. 1D15-0092PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.
On appeal from final summary judgment, the parties focus on an antecedent order granting a motion to exclude the testimony of appellant’s expert witness. The expert testified on deposition as to, among other things, the standard of care when emergency personnel respond to a 911 call seeking help for an infant reported to be struggling to breathe. Columbia County concedes that, if exclusion of the expert testimony was error, entry of summary judgment was also error. Concluding the expert testimony should have been considered in deciding the motion for summary judgment, we reverse and remand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- GLORIA PATRICIA SANCHEZ and BODY & SOUL RETREAT, LLC. v. JOHANA CINQUE and VONCENT CINQUEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- White v. Ring Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Andrew Maines and Kenneth Maines v. Marcia Drasko FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.