Legal Opinion
United States v. Sarun Cooper
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 15, 2005No. 04-1334PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal involving police enforcement of crime control, we are called upon to decide whether the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135a (2000) (the “DNA Act”) requires a defendant convicted of possession of stolen bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(c) 1 to submit a sample of her DNA to her probation officer. The DNA Act, as enacted, required offenders of certain enumerated crimes to submit a DNA sample to the United States Probation Office for analysis and indexing in a DNA database. 2
Cooper, a branch teller at M & T Bank in York,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Maribel Delrio-Mocci v. Connolly Properties IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Timothy A. Slagle v. County of Clarion Clarion County JailCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Ndayshimiye v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Albert TuponeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.