Bushing v. Iowa Railway & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
There is little, if any, conflict in the evidence. On December 9, 1917, and for some time prior thereto, August Bushing, deceased, husband of the appellee, Martha Bushing, was employed by the appellant, Iowa Railway & Light Company, as a fireman in the company’s power plant located at Marshalltown, Iowa. His duties were the general and ordinary duties of a fireman, and also the disposing of ashes and the shoveling of coal in the yard. The furnaces were fed by mechanical stokers. The employee’s working hours were from 1 o ’clock in the afternoon until 11- o ’clock in the evening. Both employer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. ShookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Quaker Oats Co. v. CihaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Komosa v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.