Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Sumrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 24, 1923No. 13820PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
Mrs. J. H. Sumrell, alleging Princess Manufacturing Company to be the employer and her husband J. H. Sumrell the employee, applied to the Industrial Commission for an award of compensation for herself and'her two minor children, as dependents of her husband,, who died on September 5, 1921, as a result of injuries received by him three days earlier. An award was granted, and the insurance carrier, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, entered an appeal to the superior court. To a judgment there rendered, affirming the order and decree of the commission, the insurance carrier excepted.
*684It is contended…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Thornton v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Murphy v. Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.