Legal Opinion

Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Shook

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 23, 1981No. 65384PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The questions here are whether defendant Leland Dale Shook was an employee of plaintiff Caterpillar Tractor Company when he was injured and, if so, whether the injuries occurred during the course of his employment. The industrial commissioner decided these questions in Shook’s favor in holding he was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Upon Caterpillar’s petition for judicial review, the district court reversed on the basis of a negative answer to the first question. Because we believe the industrial commissioner was right, we reverse the district court.

The case was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Bushing v. Iowa Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Frost v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Pribyl v. Standard Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Livingston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Bethards v. Shivvers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Finch v. Schneider Specialized Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Lauhoff Grain Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API