Legal Opinion

Mogul v. Tucker

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 6, 1987No. 86—1546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a permissive interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308) from an order striking the affirmative defense of laches. The question presented is whether defendant is precluded from raising the defense in his answer by our prior opinion in this case, Mogul v. Tucker (1981), 102 Ill. App. 3d 438, 430 N.E.2d 87.

In 1979 plaintiff filed a complaint for an accounting and specific performance of an agreement under which he claimed a 25% interest in a shopping center project. The trial court granted defendant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. WeiskopfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Johnson v. Nationwide Business Forms, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Thornton, Ltd. v. RosewellIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hitchcock v. ReynoldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. In Re Adoption of MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Senese v. Climatemp, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API