Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Reynolds

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1935No. Gen. No. 8,856PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

Appellees, Richard A. Hitchcock, Ross Wilcoxen, Alfred Wilcoxen, James Wilcoxen and Roy Cray, filed their complaint in an action at law against appellant, E. M. Reynolds, in the city court of Canton, on February 12, 1934, to recover for services which it is alleged they severally rendered appellant.

The complaint consists of five counts, in the first of which it is alleged: 1. That during the months of August, September, October and November, A. D. 1933, the defendant, E. M. Reynolds, was possessed of a certain coal mine, situated on what is known as the Whitmore Farm, two miles east and…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  2. Horwath v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Aaron-Lincoln Mercury, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Segall v. BerksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API