Legal Opinion

Brinkerhoff v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 2000No. 43923-5-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Robert Brinkerhoff appeals the trial court’s order enforcing a settlement agreement that he signed. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether there was a misrepresentation that would allow Brinkerhoff to avoid the agreement. The order is reversed so that the trial court may hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve the disputed factual issue.

Robert Brinkerhoff sustained personal injuries in a two- car automobile accident. At the time of the accident, Brinkerhoff was driving his employer’s truck in the course of his employment. He filed a worker’s compensation claim and received over…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Condon v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Lavigne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Metronet Services Corporation Metronet Telemanagement Corporation v. Us West CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API