Legal Opinion

Eugster v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 2002No. 20078-7-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, A.C.J.

— Stephen K. Eugster appeals the dismissal of his complaint against the City of Spokane, Spokane City Council, and four Council members over the selection process proposed to fill a vacant Council position. Mr. Eugster alleged violations of the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA), chapter 42.30 RCW, entitling him to attorney fees, equitable relief and declaratory judgment. Before dismissal, Mr. Eugster unsuccessfully sought disqualification of the defendants’ attorneys and CR 11 sanctions. Because genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether a “meeting” took place in violation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API