Legal Opinion

Haff v. Haff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Macomb. (Stevens, J.) Bill to set aside deeds and clear title. Cross-bill to set aside mortgage. Almon D. Jenney appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

The purpose of the original bill in this cause was to set aside as void a deed of forty acres of land in Sterling, Macomb county, made by complainant and his wife to defendant Jenney, in November, 1849; and also another deed of the same lands, given by defendant Jenney to Asenath Haff and Lorenzo D. Haff in February, 1868, ■and a mortgage of the same date given by the grantees to Jenney for the sum of fourteen hundred dollars, and to restrain Jenney from further proceeding with a foreclosure of the mortgage. The leading facts in the case are the following :

Asenath Haff is the wife of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campau v. Van DykeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Compo v. Jackson Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chase v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
  2. Duffield v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Mathews v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Eames v. ManleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Jones v. National Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API