Compo v. Jackson Iron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.) Bill to establish title. Defendant appeals. ■
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
(Minority opiniom) The object of the bill in this case is to obtain an accounting and other proper relief against defendant, by reason of an agreement made by the association now represented by defendant and existing in 1846, promising and securing to an Indian Chief named in the record Marji Gesick, twelve thirty-one hundredths of the mining property in Marquette county, originally known as location 593, owned and worked by defendant. The bill is substantially the same as when before us on demurrer, as the case is reported in 49 Mich. 39. It will only be necessary, therefore, to refer to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fearey v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Johnson v. Johnson's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Campau v. Van DykeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Boyer ex rel. McGee v. DivelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Dole v. IrishNew York Supreme Court · 1848
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Kobogum v. Jackson Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Kapigian v. Der MinassianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Hallowell v. CommonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Children of the Chippewa, Ottawa & Potawatomy Tribes v. Regents of the University of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.