Legal Opinion

Duffield v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron Works

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to superior court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings' error. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

This suit was commenced by attachment The declaration filed is upon the common counts in assumpsit, and the plaintiff claims to recover back money paid for stock in defendant corporation, under the count for money had and received, on the ground that it- was obtained from him by the fraud and false and fraudulent representations of the defendant.

Under an order of the court obtained on motion of defendant, he filed a bill of particulars of the fraud charged in obtaining the money, as follows:

“The specific fraud charged in obtaining said money is this: That it was obtained under color of a sale…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Ogilvie v. Knox Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. In the Matter of the Reciprocity BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lex v. Selway Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Wallace v. HoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API