Legal Opinion

Bocker v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1963No. Civ. 26441PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, P.

Kathryn Bocker, a minor, by her father as her guardian ad litem, and her father, Verlin G. Bocker, on his own behalf, brought this action against defendant for injuries sustained when defendant’s horse, upon which the father and Ms daughter were mounted, reared up and came over backwards on top of them. The suit was based on two separate theories: (1) negligence and (2) ownership of a vicious and dangerous horse known to be such by the owner. After presentation of plaintiffs’ case, the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit against both plaintiffs. As to the father, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Timmsen v. Forest E. Olson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Russell v. SoldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Calrow v. Appliance Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Drake v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Drake v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API