Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Asbestos Corporation Limited

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 4, 2013No. 20110544-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge:

T1 Micah Riggs, on behalf of his mother-in-law, the decedent Vickie Warren, 1 appeals the trial court's decision that the Comparative Negligence Act (CNA), and therefore joint and several liability, did not apply in this case. Defendant Union Carbide Corporation eross-appeals, arguing that its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was wrongly denied because the raw material supplier rule shields Union Carbide from liability under the facts of this case. Aiterna-tively, Union Carbide argues in its cross-appeal that there was insufficient evidence to support the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Georgia-Pacific LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Bardsley v. PlugerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Nat'l Title Agency LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. Larsen v. Blue BirdDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  5. Leathers v. Union CarbideSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API