Legal Opinion

Bardsley v. Pluger

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2015No. DA 15-0017PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Scott Bardsley and Dora Cichantek (collectively, the Plaintiffs) appeal from two separate orders issued by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County. In the first, dated February 6, 2013, the District Court sua sponte amended an earlier August 21, 2012 order of protection. In the second, the District Court denied the Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, granted summary judgment to Lizann Pluger and Earnest Anderson (collectively, the Defendants), and awarded attorney’s fees to the Defendants. We vacate the District Court’s February 6,2013 amended order of protection.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lindey's Inc. v. Professional Consultants, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Erker v. KesterMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Peuse v. MalkuchMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n v. Amsden, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re the Estate of McDermottMontana Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Craig Tracts v. Brown DrakeMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Harrington v. Energy West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Estate of Mandich v. FrenchMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Moodys Market v. State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. HSBC Bank v. NickersonMontana Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API