Legal Opinion

Freedman v. CHOLICK ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1963PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract.

Plaintiff paid defendant $250 for an option to buy a corner lot in downtown Portland for $115,000. Plaintiff in due course elected to exercise the option. Defendant was unable to deliver possession. This action followed. Plaintiff demanded in damages the difference between $115,000 and $132,000, the alleged market value of the property at the time he exercised the option. He also demanded $250 as return of his consideration for the option and $320 as lost interest on purchase money deposited in escrow by plaintiff. The jury found for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Parmentier v. RansomOregon Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Reed v. WadsworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rader v. Gibbons and Reed CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Green v. Uncle Don's Mobile CityOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Osborne v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API