Willett v. Schmeiser Manufacturing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
— The plaintiffs commenced an action to recover a judgment for moneys loaned. The defendants appeared separately and answered. The Schmeiser Manufacturing Company in its answer set up a counterclaim in three different counts. A trial was had before the trial court sitting without a jury. Findings were made in favor of the plaintiffs on their two separate causes of action, and in favor of the defendant the Schmeiser Manufacturing Company on its counterclaim, and against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendant T. G. Schmeiser. A judgment was entered in accordance with the findings and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Roberts v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Metropolis Trust & Savings Bank v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Burks v. WeastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Churchill v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Haley v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928