Legal Opinion

York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 29, 1968No. 23137PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Groves.

The parties appear here in the same order as in the district court, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants. The matter is here on an agreed statement under R.C.P. Colo. 112(e). The only question presented is whether plaintiff is entitled to interest upon moneys payable to it by the defendants.

The parties entered into a contract dated November 29, 1961, under which plaintiff performed plumbing, heating, ventilating and process work on the defendants’ premises. The amount payable under the contract was $83,260.59, of which the plaintiff was paid…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Wells v. CrawfordColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Weaver v. First National Bank of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. Hendrie v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Buerger Investment Co. v. B. F. Salzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Columbine Valley Construction Co. v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. HouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. First National Bank of Meeker v. TheosColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API