Legal Opinion

Branson v. Sharp Healthcare, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2011No. D056892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

The beneficiary of medical services under the California medical assistance program (Medi-Cal) is required to reimburse the State Department of Health Care Services (the Department) for the costs of medical care from a recovery obtained in a tort action against a third party liable for the beneficiary’s injuries. The Department’s claim, however, “is limited to that portion of a settlement, judgment, or award that represents payment for medical expenses, or medical care, provided on behalf of the beneficiary.” (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 § 14124.76, subd. (a); see Arkansas…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp.California Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Kight v. Cashcall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Doe v. Vermont Office of Health AccessSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Aguilera v. Loma Linda University Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API