Legal Opinion
Newhouse v. McCormick & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 10, 1996No. 4:CV94-3118PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
McCormick & Co., Inc. (McCormick) moves for judgment as a matter of law, for a new trial, or, in the alternative, to alter or amend the judgment in this case. (Filing 107.) After careful review, I shall deny McCormick’s motion, with one exception.
I shall grant McCormick’s motion for new trial as to damages only regarding Plaintiffs claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) unless within ten (10) days after entry of this memorandum and order Plaintiff, through his counsel, files and serves a remittitur, consenting that the front-pay…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 633, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,169 Theodore Kolb v. Goldring, Inc., Theodore Kolb v. Goldring, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Hybert v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Guthrie v. J.C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Edmund H. Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School, Inc., Edmund H. Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coffey v. Fayette Tubular ProductsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Ogden v. Wax Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Prine v. Sioux City Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000