Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1946No. 264PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
In a complaint filed under Section 204 (a) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 924(a), complain*615ant attacks the validity of certain provisions of price regulations Nos. 422, 423 and 390 (8 F. R. 9395, 9407, 6428) and Los Angeles Order No. 5 having to do with the respective price ceilings of retail stores classified upon the basis of volume of sales. The Administrator included complainant in Group 4, which covers independent or chain stores having gross annual sales in the base period of over $250,000. Group 2, in which complainant claims he should have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Conklin Pen Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Safeway Stores v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Terminal Freight Handling Co. v. SolienCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Van Der Loo v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Woods v. KayeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Taylor v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.