Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 1946No. 279PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Chief Judge.
The complaint now before us keeps alive a controversy which on the surface appears to have its origin in a difference of opinion as to the maximum rents permissible for housing units in a building owned by the complainant, but which actually is deeply rooted in the complainant’s bitter antagonism in principle to all rent control. Maximum Rent Regulation No. 281 established March 1, 1942 as the maximum rent date for housing accommodations in the San Francisco Bay Defense-Rental Area. The Price Administrator has consistently ruled that Section 4(a) of the *807regulation 2 is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Taylor v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re RiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Bauer v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Chippewa County Co-op. Dairy v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- United States v. EricsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.