Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Koch

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 16, 1939No. 6808PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Our opinion in this case commences with an unusually detailed relation of the facts. In that recital special emphasis is directed to dates. This is done with a full realization that both the statement and decision of facts are in the normal course particularly the province of the trial court. Here, however, we think their recapitulation useful in illustration of our conclusions.

The Claims in Litigation.

On April 12, 1934, plaintiff-appellant, a casualty insurance corporation, issued a combination automobile policy to the non-resisting defendant-appellee, Seymour Ress, for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boyle Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API