Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Finkle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20130047PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Nancy Finkle appealed from an order and judgment quieting title to 1/2 of the mineral interests in certain real property in Mountrail County in Leslie D. Johnson, Carol Johnson, Merlyn H. Johnson, Thea Donna D. Johnson, Delores Al-bertson and their children (“Johnsons”). Finkle claims she owns 1/4 of the mineral interests. The district court held Finkle does not have an interest in the minerals. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Axel and Norma Anderson (“Andersons”) owned all of the surface and minerals in the Mountrail County property described as:

Township 158 North, Range 91…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Nichols v. GoughnourNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gawryluk v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Zent v. ZentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gilbertson v. CharlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. v. EOG Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Hokanson v. ZeiglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Beckstrand Ex Rel. Beckstrand v. BeckstrandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. v. EOG Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. Beckstrand Ex Rel. Beckstrand v. BeckstrandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API