Woodbury v. Dorman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision of the appeal in this case, (see preceding opinion,) the defendant made a motion for a re-argument.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
JBy the Oonrt In this case, which was heard and determined at the last July term, the defendant moves for a re-argument. The plaintiff having been brought into court upon an order to show cause, counsel were heard upon the motion for a ro-argument, and at the same time were permitted, for convenience, to present their views as upon a re-argument of the case. This was done, however, without waiver of the plaintiff’s objections, and with the understanding, that if the court should be of opinion that no sufficient cause was shown for a re-argument, it would be unnecessary to go further, so far…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Mount v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- United States v. Knight's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Calvert v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- People ex rel.Attorney General v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1840
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Cordner v. CordnerUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Norris v. HealdMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Francisco v. HatchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.