Legal Opinion

Norris v. Heald

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District, Madison County. Foreclosure. Plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s answer was sustained by Galbraith, J„

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

This action was commenced to foreclose three mortgages which were given to secure the payment of certain promissory notes. The court below, in passing upon a demurrer' to the answer, decided that the case of Bass v. Buker, 6 Mont. 442, was applicable to the issue of law raised by the pleadings, and judgment was entered for the mortgagors.

It appears from the record that Charles P. Bradley, Sr., made, in the year 1877, a pre-emption filing upon the tract of land which is described in the pleadings and mortgages. Bradley died in the year 1879, and the answer alleges that “the final proof in said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Myers v. CroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Fuller & Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Warren v. Van BruntSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Mellison v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Adam v. McClintockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Wilcox v. JohnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Lohman State Bank v. GrimMontana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API