Cordner v. Cordner
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The petition for rehearing in the present case does not submit any proposition or question which was not fully considered by the court in rendering its decision. While the allegations of the complaint were set out in full and considerable was said about the testimony, the decision rested finally upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
For the reason that there has been, since the case was decided, a change in the personnel of the court, the proposition is presented as to whether or not the new member of the court recently elected and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Detroit v. BlackebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Brown v. Aspden's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Peoples v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- In Re Thompson's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Lowe v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Jones v. Flour City Ornamental Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.