Mount v. . Mitchell
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per. Ottr.tatvt.
Motions for re-argument should be founded on papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court; or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel.
2Cited by26 opinions
- Curley v. TomlinsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Woodbury v. DormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Hand v. RogersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
- Heald v. MacGowanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.