Legal Opinion

Mount v. . Mitchell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Ottr.tatvt.

Motions for re-argument should be founded on papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court; or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel.

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Curley v. TomlinsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
  2. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Woodbury v. DormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  4. Hand v. RogersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  5. Heald v. MacGowanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API