Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Michigan Health Maintenance Organization

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1988No. Docket 95966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

On June 7, 1984, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the decision of the hearing referee awarding plaintiff benefits for a psychiatric injury. Defendants appealed by leave granted and this Court vacated the decision of the wcab and remanded to the wcab for further proceedings consistent with our opinion, Murdock v Michigan Health Maintenance Organization, 151 Mich App 578, 584; 391 NW2d 757 (1986). On remand, the wcab reaffirmed its original award to plaintiff. Defendants again appeal by leave granted and we again vacate the award.

The underlying facts of this dispute were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mertz v. MertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Horvath v. La FondMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ratliff v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Fuchs v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Billingsley v. GulickMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Torsky v. Avon Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  3. Murdock v. Michigan Health Maintenance OrganizationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Wilkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API