Legal Opinion
Billingsley v. Gulick
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 35,844PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff, administratrix of her husband’s estate, sued defendants to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s intes tate. Judgment for plaintiff on the first trial was reversed by this court. Billingsley v. Gulick, 252 Mich. 235. On retrial, there was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
The first question presented is the effect on the second trial of the waiver of defendants’ disqualification as witnesses on the first trial, the judgment in which was reversed by this court and the cause remanded for a new trial.
When, upon the first trial, defendants were…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In re Estate of SoulardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- McKinney v. Grand Street, Prospect Park & Flatbush RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Green v. CrapoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Rice v. WaddillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mertz v. MertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Mitchell v. Reolds Farms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Michigan Gas Utilities v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Faden v. Estate of MidcapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.