Legal Opinion
E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. Harris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 6, 2001No. 01-570PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D ONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
Appellant E-Z Cash Advance, Inc., appeals the order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying its motion to compel arbitration. For reversal, E-Z Cash argues that a contract signed by Appellee Deborah Harris contained a valid arbitration clause, thus preventing her from filing suit in circuit court. We disagree, and thus, affirm.
This appeal stems from a dispute regarding the legality of certain loan transactions involving E-Z Cash and Harris. E-Z Cash is a corporation that is in the business of providing cash loans to individuals who present personal checks that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Foundation Telecommunications, Inc. v. Moe Studio, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Hart v. McChristianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. ArcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Alltel Corp. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER; CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, INC.; NURSING CONSULTANTS, INC.; And MICHAEL MORTON v. ANDREW PHILLIPS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DOROTHY PHILLIPS, and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Phillips; And on Behalf of Themselves and All OTHERS Similarly SituatedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.