Legal Opinion

Meter v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 6, 1967No. Civ. 3-67-240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVILLE, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on a petition filed by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) requesting a temporary injunction against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M), a Delaware corporation, pursuant to and under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). The Board charges that 3M is engaging in an unfair labor practice in that it has failed and refused, and still fails and refuses to bargain collectively with two local unions, both affiliated with the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
  3. Wilson v. Milk Drivers and Dairy Employees Union Local 471District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API