Legal Opinion
United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 13, 1973No. Civ. A. 1335-72PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COHEN, Chief Judge:
In this environmental protection action plaintiff, United States of America, seeks a permanent restraining order, enjoining defendant, Stoeco Homes, Inc., from conducting dredge, fill and construction operations in an area of Ocean City, New Jersey, bordered by Bay Avenue, Tennessee Avenue, Spruce Road and the Back Thorofare sector of the Intracoastal or Inland Waterway.
This Court has jurisdiction, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1333 and 1345 and 33 U.S.C. §§ 403, 406, 407, 411 and 413.
Plaintiff contends that this area is part of the navigable…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Stream Pollution Control Board of the State of Indiana, and Zarko Sekerez, Proposed Intervenor v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- United States of America v. Herman DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Sexton Cove Estates, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.