Legal Opinion

People v. Cress

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2003No. Docket 121189PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment on the basis of a new, third-party confession. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that the third-party confessor was not credible and that the confession, therefore, did not make a different result probable on retrial. The trial court’s decision necessarily hinged on determinations of credibility and was supported by the evidence. The Court of Appeals impermissibly substituted its judicial opinion for that of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. CressMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. CzarneckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. People v. TrakhtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. SchraubenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Thomas Cress v. Carmen Palmer, Warden, Riverside Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API