Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1929No. 5407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

— The defendant, for ten years assessor of Kootenai County, was convicted of embezzlement. About the middle of November, 1928, it was discovered that he was short in his accounts. His resignation was accepted and his books audited. The audit disclosed a shortage on September 30, 1927, of $2,109.90, which, on November 16, 1928, had increased to $6,138.49. There is very little conflict in the evidence on material matters. Defendant admitted the existence of the shortage, that he had taken $585 thereof; but asserted that he did not know what had become of the balance. He testified that he…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. McLennanIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. GowinIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. CarpenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. DickensIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. ErwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API