Legal Opinion
Traylor v. Gerratana
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 11, 2014No. AC35242PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this case, the plaintiff, Sylvester Traylor, commenced the present action against eighteen defendants, on divers legal theories, to obtain money damages, injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment that General Statutes § 52490a 1 is unconstitutional insofar as it requires indigent plaintiffs seeking to bring medical malpractice actions against their health care providers to obtain opinion letters supporting their claims from similar health care providers before commencing suit. The defendants are seventeen state defendants, including twelve state legislators, 2 one Superior Court…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. ZarickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Priore v. HaigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Braham v. NewbouldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Francini v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Priore v. Haig (Concurrence)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Spillane v. LamontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024