Legal Opinion

Priore v. Haig

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 7, 2022No. SC20511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS PRIORE v. STEPHANIE HAIG (SC 20511) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the common law of this state, communications made in the course of and in furtherance of administrative proceedings that are quasi-judicial in nature are absolutely privileged. Pursuant further to Kelley v. Bonney ( 221 Conn. 549), in determining whether an administrative proceeding is quasi-judicial in nature, a court may consider whether the body or entity conducting the proceeding has the discretion to apply the law to the facts and the authority (1)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Khan v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
  2. Deutsche Bank AG v. VikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API