Legal Opinion

Matter of Sandford v. Finegan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The defendants appeal, with the permission of this court, from an order of the Appellate Division unanimously afHrming an order of the Supreme Court granting a peremptory order of mandamus.

The petitioner was appointed an assistant clerk of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan, in 1918, to fill an unexpired term ending December 31, 1919. Thereafter he received several successive appointments for six-year terms, pursuant to the Greater New York Charter (§ 1373; Laws of 1901, ch. 466, as amended by Laws of 1923, ch. 145, and Laws of 1929, ch. 235). On June 28, 1932,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Matter of Fornara v. SchroederNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Matter of Carow v. Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Ciaccia v. Board of Education.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Matter of Friedman v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Amico v. Erie County LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Matter of Beggs v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Matter of Cook v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Mandle v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API