Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

On May 25, 1928, an eligible list for the position of attendance officers of the Board of Education was prepared after competitive examination. The statute at that time provided that the list should not remain in force more than three years. In the interval other examinations for the same position might be held and eligible lists prepared whenever necessary, but “ eligible lists shall not be merged and one eligible list shall be exhausted before nominations are made from a list of subsequent date.” (Education Law, § 871; Cons. Laws, ch. 16.) In 1931, before the expiration of three years from…

2Cited by69 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. Municipal Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Deas v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. MATTER OF ANDRIOLA v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Marranca v. HarboSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. People Ex Rel. Hurley v. GraberIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API