Legal Opinion

Matter of Carow v. Bd. of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1936PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The petitioner’s name was placed upon an eligible list for kindergarten teacher in February, 1929, after the petitioner had taken a competitive examination conducted by the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education. At that time the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16), section 871, provided in part that “ no eligible lists, except a principals’ eligible list shall remain in force for a longer period than three years.” The statute was amended in 1931 so as to provide that all eligible lists in existence on April 1,1931, except a principals’ eligible fist, shall remain in force for a period…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chittenden v. . WursterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Ciaccia v. Board of Education.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Cash v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Deas v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Palmer v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Matter of Wipfler v. KlebesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API