Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault. The jury also assessed punishment at seventeen (17) years confinement. The fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed in a published opinion. Rodriguez v. State, 750 S.W.2d 267 (Tex.App.1988).
In affirming the trial court’s judgment, the Court of Appeals found that there was no objection on the constitutional issues raised by appellant on appeal. The Court of Appeals then applied a harm analysis consistent with that set forth in Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
3Cited by129 opinions
- Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Matthew Ryan Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
- Sholars v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Mervyn Lopez Aldaba v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.