Legal Opinion · Concurrence

BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLC

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 16, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 12-0728Published

1Concurrence

KESSLER, Judge,

specially concurring.

¶ 13 I concur with the majority that when a trustee’s sale occurs on a parcel of land on which no construction of a dwelling has begun, the prohibition of a deficiency judgment under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 33-814(G) (Supp.2013) does not apply. However, I write separately because the decision today leaves our superior courts in a quandary. If construction has begun, when does M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Mueller, 228 Ariz. 478, 268 P.3d 1135 (App. 2011), apply? Put another way, where should the courts draw the line between the lack of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Parkway Bank & Trust Co. v. ZivkovicCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Independent Mortgage Co. v. AlaburdaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API