Legal Opinion

M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Mueller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 27, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (“M & I”) timely appeals from judgment in favor of Trevis Mueller and Lisa Mueller (collectively the “Muellers”) on its claim for a deficiency judgment. M & I relies on Mid Kansas Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corporation, 167 Ariz. 122, 804 P.2d 1310 (1991), to argue that Arizona’s anti-deficiency statute does not bar its claim. This case is distinguishable from Mid Kansas. Although the Muellers never actually occupied the dwelling, they intended to personally occupy it upon its completion.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Northern Arizona Properties v. Pinetop Properties GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API