Burke Construction, Inc. v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendants1 appeal from the denial of their motion to discharge a mechanic’s lien and lis pendens. The plaintiff asserts in his supplemental brief that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the seven day appeal period specified by General Statutes §§ 49-35c and 52-325c.2 We agree and, therefore, dismiss the defendants’ appeal.
The record contains procedural facts necessary for our conclusion. On July 20, 1994, the defendants filed a motion for discharge of a mechanic’s hen and lis pendens. On October 6,1994, the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O.J. Mann Electric Services, Inc. v. Village at Kensington Place Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Faryniarz v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Rjb Contracting, Inc. v. Hi-G Company, No. Cv 95-0466682 S (Nov. 7, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996