Legal Opinion

Euler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 2007No. PD-0472-05PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

in which PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

The question presented in this case is whether the trial court violated appellant’s federal constitutional right to due process of law when it revoked his community supervision1 and assessed punishment without affording him a separate hearing on the question of punishment. We hold that the trial court did not violate appellant’s right to due process.

The relevant facts, as reflected in the case record, are as follows. In September 2000, a Harris County grand jury returned an indictment charging appellant with bribery. See Tex. PemCode §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Issa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Pearson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Duhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Tapia, Gilbert Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Wydell Lorraine Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Binnion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Mark Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
  5. Tapia, Gilbert Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API