Legal Opinion
County of Swift v. Boyle
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1992No. C3-91-1347PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Swift County challenges the trial court’s refusal to issue a writ of mandamus requiring Pope and Stevens County auditors to file ditch assessments against land in those counties for benefits attributable to a ditch built by and located in Swift County. We affirm.
FACTS
Swift, Stevens and Pope Counties established a joint ditch authority, Joint Ditch 9, 1 having a watershed which included portions of each of the counties. Joint Ditch 9 emptied into Swift County Ditch 3, established in 1906. After Swift County Ditch 3 deteriorated, Swift County landowners petitioned the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Coduti v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Hennepin County Welfare Board v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Oelke v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re the Request of Lafayette Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX WATERSHED DISTRICT REDETERMINING BENEFITS AND DAMAGES FOR J.D. NO. 14 DATED 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 and in Re: The Appeal From the Final Order of the Board of Managers of the Bois De Sioux Watershed District Assessing Costs and Expenses of Redetermination Associated With the Redetermination of Benefits of J.D. No. 14 Dated the 27th Day of March, 2014 and in Re the Appeal From the Final Order of the Board of Managers of the Bois De Sioux Watershed District Assessing Costs and Expenses of Redetermination Associated With the Redetermination of Benefits of J.D. No. 14 Dated the 18th Day of December, 2014Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016